Does a mini-trial lead to a binding decision?

A mini-trial is a structured settlement negotiation technique often used in construction disputes or other contractual disagreements. It typically involves a neutral third-party facilitator who helps the parties present their cases in a less formal setting. Unlike a court trial or arbitration, the outcome of a mini-trial is typically non-binding. This means that the parties involved are not required to adhere to the decision made during this process.

The purpose of a mini-trial is to provide the parties with a clearer understanding of each other's positions and the strengths and weaknesses of their cases. This can lead to a negotiated resolution, but it does not enforce a legal obligation to accept any recommendations or decisions made during the mini-trial process. Because of this non-binding nature, the outcome can be viewed more as a tool for negotiation rather than a definitive legal ruling.

The other answer choices imply conditions under which a mini-trial outcome might be binding, such as written agreements or specific statutes. However, these scenarios do not typically apply to the general process of a mini-trial, reinforcing the correctness of the assertion that it does not lead to a binding decision by default.