Does a mediator have the authority to make binding decisions?

In the context of mediation, a mediator's primary role is to facilitate communication between the parties involved in a dispute, helping them to reach a mutual agreement. Unlike a judge or arbitrator, a mediator does not have the authority to impose decisions or outcomes on the parties. Instead, the mediator guides the process and encourages collaboration, allowing the parties to create their own solutions.

Since the mediator's function is non-binding, any agreement reached must be voluntarily accepted by all the parties involved. The commitment to specific terms arises only when both parties agree, which reflects the voluntary nature of mediation. Therefore, the assertion that a mediator does not have the authority to make binding decisions is correct and aligns with the principles governing mediation as a conflict resolution method.